Transformers 1 was all human story and 30 minutes of fighting. Part 2 was 30 seconds of human story and 2 hrs?

of fighting.



Which is better? being bored to death by two people in love in the middle of a war fought by machines who dont even fight till the end of the movie,



or a movie where its constant ACTION.



I say Part 2 by a 100000000000000000000000 miles.Transformers 1 was all human story and 30 minutes of fighting. Part 2 was 30 seconds of human story and 2 hrs?No Way. TF 2 didn't have Anthony Anderson or John Voigt ruining it but it was Sam's mom, agent Simmons and that Leo guy trying to get the audience to love them. I wished they'd do their routine then get out of the way, or die!

There wasn't enough Autobot and Decepticon action, just a quest to revive both leaders and Waaayy too many generic robots that served as fodder. Didn't it suck that Sideways didn't get to do anything but get cut in half? Them 40 Plus robots were nothing but Decepticons without transformations or names.

I wish it was about the robots and their war, then it would've been all action AND a no love story. It's more like an hour and 3 1/4 of human bull$#!%26amp; and 45 min of robotsTransformers 1 was all human story and 30 minutes of fighting. Part 2 was 30 seconds of human story and 2 hrs?a bunch of action with no real story is like candy: it's "oh-so" good, but when you finish, it's just empty calories



frankly I didn't like either film. it's too bad, could've had an awesome awesome series. those who are old school, or just old and remember the original cartoon, this could have been a better told story, but what the hell...look who is in charge of the movie franchise...he's not known to have good story telling. his idea is CAKE, CAKE and MORE CAKE.